Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118569›Full record

ArticleCancer2026

Germline genetic testing among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A Pancreatic Cancer Action Network patient survey.

Udhayvir S Grewal, Rishi R Patel, Bradley T Loeffler, Sydney Rathjens, Kawther Abdilleh, Fatima Zelada-Arenas, Nicholas J Hornstein, Timothy J Brown, Seth J Concors, Naomi H Fei and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Udhayvir S GrewalWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Rishi R PatelUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Bradley T LoefflerHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Sydney RathjensPancreatic Cancer Action Network, El Segundo, California, USA.
Kawther AbdillehPancreatic Cancer Action Network, El Segundo, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5316-9366
Fatima Zelada-ArenasPancreatic Cancer Action Network, El Segundo, California, USA.
Nicholas J HornsteinNorthwell Health Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Timothy J BrownSimmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4843-4639
Seth J ConcorsWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Naomi H FeiHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Saima SharifHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Chandrikha ChandrasekharanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Project 3: GLP1R and GIPR Agonists in GEP NETs ProjectP50CA302572 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2025 to 2026
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA302572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 10%-15% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harbor pathogenic germline genetic alterations with direct therapeutic and hereditary cancer implications, leading to guideline recommendations for universal germline genetic testing regardless of family history.

methodsThe authors conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey in collaboration with the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN). Surveys were distributed October-December 2024 to registry participants. Primary outcomes included being offered and completion of germline genetic testing. Secondary outcomes included genetic counseling, mutation results, and cascade testing among first-degree relatives (FDR). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with testing offer and completion.

resultsAmong 1046 respondents, 66.2% were offered germline genetic testing and 69.2% completed testing. Black race, lack of insurance, unknown stage at diagnosis, and treatment at community practices were associated with lower odds of being offered testing. Completion of testing was lower among Black and Hispanic participants, uninsured individuals, and those treated in community settings, whereas patients with stage IV disease had the highest odds of completion. Among tested participants, 23.2% had a pathogenic germline variant, most commonly BRCA2, ATM, and BRCA1. Only 61.7% of mutation-positive respondents reported cascade testing in an FDR. Receipt of genetic counseling was associated with higher rates of cascade testing (p < .01).

conclusionsUniversal germline genetic testing in PDAC remains incompletely implemented, with persistent inequities. Lack of discussion or offer of testing represents a key missed opportunity, underscoring the need for targeted interventions and expanded access.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesgenetic counselinggermline genetic testinginequitiespancreatic cancerprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID42118569
PMCPMC13166122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.