ArticleCancer2026
Germline genetic testing among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A Pancreatic Cancer Action Network patient survey.
Article in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 10%-15% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harbor pathogenic germline genetic alterations with direct therapeutic and hereditary cancer implications, leading to guideline recommendations for universal germline genetic testing regardless of family history.
methodsThe authors conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey in collaboration with the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN). Surveys were distributed October-December 2024 to registry participants. Primary outcomes included being offered and completion of germline genetic testing. Secondary outcomes included genetic counseling, mutation results, and cascade testing among first-degree relatives (FDR). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with testing offer and completion.
resultsAmong 1046 respondents, 66.2% were offered germline genetic testing and 69.2% completed testing. Black race, lack of insurance, unknown stage at diagnosis, and treatment at community practices were associated with lower odds of being offered testing. Completion of testing was lower among Black and Hispanic participants, uninsured individuals, and those treated in community settings, whereas patients with stage IV disease had the highest odds of completion. Among tested participants, 23.2% had a pathogenic germline variant, most commonly BRCA2, ATM, and BRCA1. Only 61.7% of mutation-positive respondents reported cascade testing in an FDR. Receipt of genetic counseling was associated with higher rates of cascade testing (p < .01).
conclusionsUniversal germline genetic testing in PDAC remains incompletely implemented, with persistent inequities. Lack of discussion or offer of testing represents a key missed opportunity, underscoring the need for targeted interventions and expanded access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.