SynthesisCJEM2026
Utilization of emergency departments by individuals with refugee status: a systematic review of studies using data from Canadian care centers.
Synthesis in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAs global efforts to support displaced persons grow, Canada has taken significant steps to accept and resettle refugees. However, refugees in Canada often experience greater health disparities and more barriers to accessing healthcare compared to non-refugees. Acknowledging how these challenges affect their healthcare utilization, this systematic review aimed to examine the current state of knowledge of emergency department (ED) presentation patterns among Canadian refugees compared to non-refugee patients.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched from inception until October 2024. Studies were included if they provided quantitative data comparing refugee and non-refugee ED presentations in Canada. Meta-analysis was not performed because of the limited number of studies and heterogeneity.
resultsEleven studies met the inclusion criteria, including data from Ontario, Quebec, and Alberta. Six studies focused on children or young adults (≤ 24 years old). ED presentations were categorized into general adult and pediatric presentations, mental health presentations for both groups, and pregnancy-related presentations. Unintentional injury was the most common presentation for both refugee and non-refugee patients, followed by respiratory and abdominal complaints. Refugees showed higher rates of certain ED visits, particularly for pregnancy-related issues and postpartum psychiatric concerns. They also demonstrated higher presentation rates for intentional self-harm compared to non-refugee immigrants. However, these findings derive from individual studies rather than pooled data.
conclusionsAlthough comprehensive data on refugees' use of Canadian emergency departments remains limited, unintentional injuries were the most commonly reported reason for ED visits, with comparatively higher rates of pregnancy-related and mental health-related presentations also observed. These patterns may indicate barriers to accessing outpatient services, potentially due to limited knowledge of the healthcare system, underlying cultural stigma, or the need for upfront payments to access these services. Further interventions are recommended to improve access to outpatient healthcare for refugee populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.