ArticleRice (New York, N.Y.)2026
Understanding Rice Responses to the Combination of Bacterial Panicle Blight and High Night Temperatures.
Article in Rice (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The disease Bacterial Panicle Blight (BPB) caused by the bacterium Burkholderia glumae is one of the major constraints of global rice production and has been more prevalent in years experiencing unusually high night temperatures (HNT). These observations suggest that BPB could become more devastating in the future with the increase in global temperatures. To initially understand the interplay between BPB and HNT, we compared the phenotypic responses of 20 rice accessions after B. glumae inoculation at two night temperatures: normal night temperature (22 °C) or high night temperature (28 °C). The results revealed temperature-dependent and temperature-independent responses ranging from enhanced susceptibility to moderate resistance. To dissect the genetic basis of these differential responses, we used comparative transcriptomics on two selected temperature-independent accessions with contrasting responses. Comparisons within and between accessions resulted in 6346 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis followed by functional characterization, identified 146 genes related to biotic and abiotic stress responses and mapped to several functional categories such as proteolysis, defense signaling, transcription factors, secondary metabolism and hormone regulation. Interestingly, in response to single stress (BPB or HNT) or combined stresses (BPB and HNT), those genes have equivalent pattern of gene expression in each accession. The results from this work unraveled the complexity of rice responses to BPB when combined with HNT, uncovering candidate genes responding to this combination of stresses, which could be further utilized to develop multiple stress resilient rice varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.