Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118507›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026

Near-field substrate analysis in ventricular tachycardia: a novel approach to identify the critical isthmus.

Federica Giordano, Federico Ballacci, Chiara Pavone, Ambra Del Greco, Roberto Scacciavillani, Gaetano Pinnacchio, Gianluigi Bencardino, Francesco Perna, Gianluca Comerci, Massimo Imazio and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Federica GiordanoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-5847
Federico BallacciDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0341-1142
Chiara PavoneDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Ambra Del GrecoAbbott Medical, Via Paracelso 20, Agrate Brianza, 20864, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2323-2605
Roberto ScacciavillaniDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, 00168, Italy. roberto.scacciavillani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-4088
Gaetano PinnacchioDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-1682
Gianluigi BencardinoDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-1143
Francesco PernaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-9492
Gianluca ComerciDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Massimo ImazioCardiothoracic Department, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, 33100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-0245
Maria Lucia NarducciDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-0322
Gemma PelargonioDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3236-3458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAblation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) relies on accurate electroanatomical mapping (EAM) to identify critical reentry circuit sites. Analysis of local peak frequency (PF) and Vector Field Disarray (VFD) may serve as useful metrics to improve EAM accuracy.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed high-density EAM data from consecutive patients who underwent VT ablation using the EnSite X System with Advisor HD Grid catheter at our institution. PF and VFD distributions were analyzed for co-localization with conventional substrate markers and activation-mapped VT isthmus sites. The diagnostic accuracy of PF for identifying VT isthmus sites was assessed using mixed-effects models and ROC analysis.

resultsSixty maps from 34 patients (70.5 years, 52.9% ischemic) were analyzed. Within low-voltage areas, median PF was 280 Hz and VFD 60%. At baseline, VT isthmus sites had higher PF than non-isthmus sites (372 ± 96 vs. 247 ± 84 Hz, p < 0.0001), with 16% higher odds of isthmus presence per 10-Hz increase (OR 1.016, p < 0.0001, AUC 0.849). A 315 Hz threshold provided an accuracy of 78% (sensitivity 72%, specificity 84%) in identification of isthmus areas. Post-ablation PF decreased to 123 ± 42 Hz (p < 0.0001).

conclusionAnalysis of PF and VFD may enhance the identification of VT critical isthmus sites by improving near-field signal annotation and detecting wavefront collision zones. These metrics should be considered as a complementary tool to conventional EAM.

Indexed as

Omnipolar technologyPeak frequency analysisVector field disarrayVentricular arrhythmiaVentricular tachycardia ablation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.