ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Brucine-loaded hydrogel microneedles for sustained anti-inflammatory therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: programmable drug release and detachable design.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a brucine (Bru) hydrogel-forming microneedle (Bru-HFM) delivery system that could achieve long-term, programmed drug release, through adjusting degree of cross-linking in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/carbomer 934P (CP) hydrogel. A one-way orthogonal experiment and a Franz diffusion cell were employed to optimize the preparation process. The resulting Bru-HFM exhibited favorable appearance, mechanical strength, and swelling properties. The drug release performance of the different drug-carrying sites of HFMs was compared. The results illustrated that in vivo drug release rate over 144 h was significantly higher in the needle body-carrying group (95.32%) than in the whole-microneedle (51.85%) and back-lining groups (57.39%). The amount of residue in the back-lining group was obvious, in line with expectations. The burst release rate of 78.81% could meet the high-dose demand during the acute phase of inflammation, whereas continuous release through the cross-linking network over 48-144 h achieved a total release rate of 95.32%. This covered the maintenance phase of chronic inflammation treatment, and the microneedles remained structurally intact at the end of drug release, permitting their detachable. The general pharmacodynamic evaluation results demonstrated that the pathological state of the ankle joints of rats with collagen-induced arthritis was significantly improved in the needle body-carrying group, which also exhibited significantly reduced serum levels of IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α (all P < 0.05), indicating a significant therapeutic effect on rheumatoid arthritis. This study provides a new strategy and theoretical basis for designing HFMs for programmed drug release and inflammatory disease treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.