Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118490›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026

Improving ozone-based processes for the degradation of paraquat and diquat as persistent pesticides.

Joseph Soto-Verjel, Paula Serrano-Tarí, Salvador Villamizar, Ana Ruiz-Delgado, Aymer Maturana-Córdoba, Isabel Oller

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph Soto-VerjelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Instituto de Estudios Hidráulicos y Ambientales IDEHA, Universidad Del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Paula Serrano-TaríCIEMAT, Departamento de Energía, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, Plataforma Solar de Almería Tabernas, Almería, Spain.
Salvador VillamizarDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Instituto de Estudios Hidráulicos y Ambientales IDEHA, Universidad Del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Ana Ruiz-DelgadoCIEMAT, Departamento de Energía, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, Plataforma Solar de Almería Tabernas, Almería, Spain.
Aymer Maturana-CórdobaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Instituto de Estudios Hidráulicos y Ambientales IDEHA, Universidad Del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Isabel OllerCIEMAT, Departamento de Energía, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, Plataforma Solar de Almería Tabernas, Almería, Spain. ioller@psa.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-6207

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2022-140875OB-C32Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Becas de excelencia doctoral del Bicentenario 1er corte
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of bipyridylium herbicides like paraquat (PQ) and diquat (DQ) poses a significant environmental threat due to their high toxicity and recalcitrance. This study evaluates advanced oxidation processes based on ozonation as a robust alternative for their degradation. Simple ozonation was tested at various dosages (0.9 to 1.8 gh⁻

Indexed as

DiquatOzoneParaquatAliivibrio fischeriCatalysisHerbicidesOxidation-ReductionPesticidesTitaniumWater Pollutants, ChemicalDiquatHerbicidesOzoneParaquatPesticidesTitaniumtitanium dioxideWater Pollutants, ChemicalDiquat, Fe3O4ParaquatPhotocatalytic ozonationTiO2Toxicity

Identifiers

PMID42118490
PMCPMC13226348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.