ReviewMolecular and cellular pediatrics2026
In-hospital rotavirus vaccination in premature and medically ill infants: a systematic review of uptake and safety.
Review in Molecular and cellular pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRotavirus vaccination is widely recommended in infancy and has substantially reduced morbidity from severe gastroenteritis. In premature and medically ill infants, prolonged hospitalization often interferes with timely vaccination. Despite recommendations to vaccinate clinically stable hospitalized infants according to chronological age, concerns regarding adverse events, apnea-bradycardia episodes, and nosocomial transmission continue to limit uptake in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Delayed vaccination may result in missed opportunities, as initiation after 24 weeks of age is contraindicated. The objective of this review was to systematically assess the evidence on the administration of rotavirus vaccines to premature and medically ill infants during their in-hospital stay (e.g., neonatal intensive care units or postnatal wards), and to evaluate the occurrence, type, and frequency of adverse events following such vaccination.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched without restrictions on publication year or language. Eligible studies included premature or medically ill infants who received rotavirus vaccination during hospitalization. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series with at least five infants were considered. Data were extracted on vaccination uptake, adverse events, viral shedding, and nosocomial infection. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
resultsFifteen observational studies including a total number of 5,443 infants met inclusion criteria; no randomized controlled trials were identified. Vaccination uptake varied widely and was generally low in routine clinical practice. Reported adverse events were predominantly mild and transient, with gastrointestinal symptoms being most common. Fever occurred in up to 10% of vaccinated infants. No cases of intussusception or volvulus were reported. Apnea-bradycardia episodes were inconsistently documented; where assessed, their frequency was comparable to baseline rates or to those observed after routine two-month vaccinations. Viral shedding of vaccine-strain rotavirus was frequently detected, particularly after the first dose; however, nosocomial transmission to unvaccinated infants was rare and not associated with symptomatic gastroenteritis. Overall certainty of evidence was low due to heterogeneity and moderate to high risk of bias.
conclusionAvailable evidence suggests that in-hospital rotavirus vaccination in clinically stable premature and medically ill infants is generally safe and not associated with relevant nosocomial infection. Nevertheless, uptake remains inconsistent. Standardized protocols, provider education, and implementation-focused strategies are needed to reduce missed vaccination opportunities and ensure timely protection in this high-risk population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION (PROSPERO): CRD420251163827.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.