ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Personalized multivariable clinical prognostic model for patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving intensive chemotherapy.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop and validate a personalized prognostic model for patients with newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving intensive cytarabine- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 161 patients treated at a single center and externally validated the model in 184 patients from two institutions.
resultsUsing LASSO Cox regression, nine readily available clinical variables (age, sex, performance status, history of diabetes, respiratory disease, prior myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasm, serum albumin level, uric acid level, and adverse cytogenetic risk) were selected to construct a nomogram. The model demonstrated good discrimination of overall survival, with a concordance index of 0.721 and 0.678 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration plots showed strong agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Based on the nomogram scores, the patients were stratified into three risk groups, with 3-year overall survival rates of 84.1%, 57.2%, and 11.9% in the good, intermediate, and poor-risk groups, respectively. To enhance clinical accessibility, an online tool was developed for use in real-world settings.
conclusionThis nomogram integrates disease- and patient-related factors and allows for individualized prognostic assessment. This may support clinical assessment through personalized risk evaluation in AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.