SynthesisImmunologic research2026
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in interstitial lung disease: results from a cross-sectional study and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Immunologic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) across different subtypes of interstitial lung disease (ILD), specifically idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) without ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), and AAV-ILD. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the positivity rate and clinical characteristics of ANCA in ILD. In the following meta-analysis, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for eligible studies reporting positivity rate of ANCA in ILD. The pooled positivity rates of ANCA, MPO and PR3 in ILD were calculated, and survival outcome between ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative ILD patients were compared. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses and meta-regression was also conducted. A total of 217 ILD patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study, with an ANCA positivity rate of 7%. In the meta-analysis, with 24 studies and 4,424 patients, the pooled positivity rate of ANCA in IPF, CTD-ILD without AAV, and AAV-ILD were 9%, 15% and 97%, respectively. In patients with IPF, patients with ANCA positivity were more likely to develop honeycombing (OR 2.70, 95%CI 1.09, 6.70, p = 0.03). No significant difference was observed in survival time between IPF patients with or without ANCA positivity (HR 1.18, 95%CI 0.73, 1.90). The positivity rate of ANCA varies significantly across different subtypes of ILD. Future research should focus on the characteristics and prognostic value of ANCA positivity in other ILD subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.