Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118436›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026

Reclaiming Agency Through Birth: Birth Mode, Postpartum Mental Health, and Ethical Responsibilities in High-Risk Pregnancies.

Orli Dahan, Yael Sciaky-Tamir, Shenhav Albo, Inbar Ben Shachar, Omer Horovitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Orli DahanDepartment of Multidisciplinary Studies, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Qiryat Shemona, Israel. orlydah@telhai.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-3361
Yael Sciaky-TamirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Shenhav AlboAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Inbar Ben ShacharDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Omer HorovitzDepartment of Psychology, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Qiryat Shemona, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study examines whether mode of birth is associated with postpartum psychological distress among women who experienced high-risk versus low-risk pregnancies. It adds an ethical perspective to the literature by considering how medicalization of birth may differentially affect women's autonomy and well-being across pregnancy risk contexts. Method In a cohort of 138 women who gave birth at a northern Israeli hospital (January to September 2023), psychological outcomes were measured eight weeks postpartum using the DASS-21 and PTSD Checklist (PCL-5). Birth mode and pregnancy risk status were extracted from medical records. Pearson correlations were computed separately for high-risk (n = 20) and low-risk (n = 118) groups. Results Among women with high-risk pregnancies, more medicalized birth modes were significantly correlated with higher levels of stress (rp = 0.655), anxiety (rp = 0.863), depression (rp = 0.726), and PTSD symptoms (rp = 0.789). No significant associations were found in the low-risk group. Conclusions Birth mode plays a critical role in postpartum mental health for women with high-risk pregnancies. These findings underscore the ethical duty to prevent psychological harm and to respect women's relational autonomy, making trauma-informed, autonomy-supportive care a moral imperative in medically complex births.

Indexed as

Birth modeEthics of careHigh-risk pregnancyPostpartum psychological distressPTSDRelational autonomy

Identifiers

PMID42118436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.