Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118394›Full record

Observational studyArchives of women's mental health2026

Racial differences in diagnosis of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders.

Stephanie V Hall, Angela Montoya, Anca Tilea, Diana Louis, Kara Zivin, Vanessa K Dalton

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of women's mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie V HallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. stephall@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-4735
Angela MontoyaProgram On Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anca TileaProgram On Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Diana LouisDepartment of Women's and Gender Studies, College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kara ZivinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vanessa K DaltonProgram On Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Impact of state health policy on women's mental healthR01MH132937 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VANESSA K. DALTON, Kara Zivin · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
NIH HHS R01MH132937NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH132937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) represent a common comorbidity of pregnancy and postpartum with serious consequences. Despite high disease prevalence and burden, PMADs often remain undiagnosed. In recent years, universal screening for perinatal mental health disorders has become standard care and most patients are screened at least once during pregnancy or postpartum. Whether racial differences in PMAD diagnosis persist remains unknown. We aimed to measure and assess temporal trends in racial differences in PMAD diagnosis among symptomatic pregnant and postpartum Medicaid enrollees in Michigan.

methodsThis serial cross-sectional observational study analyzed data from the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (MI-PRAMS) and Michigan Medicaid administrative claims for deliveries spanning 2016-2020. We linked MI-PRAMS responses to Medicaid claims from one year before through one year after delivery to determine whether enrollees who reported PMAD symptoms to MI-PRAMS received a PMAD diagnosis in Medicaid claims. We used weighted logistic regression to determine the association between race and PMAD diagnosis among Michigan Medicaid enrollees who reported PMAD symptoms.

resultsOut of 60,583 Medicaid enrollees with a live birth in Michigan from 2016-2020, 33% were Black and 61% were White. About 70% were between 19-29 years old and 18% were between 30-34 years old. During the perinatal period, 39% had 2 or more co-morbid conditions, and 60% had 2 or more major life stressors. In unadjusted weighted logistic regression, White enrollees had 2.146 times greater odds of PMAD diagnosis than Black enrollees (95% CI: 1.570-2.933). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, ethnicity, co-morbidities, major life stressors, and delivery year. Adjusted weighted logistic regression found that White enrollees had 2.326 times greater odds of PMAD diagnosis than Black enrollees (95% CI: 1.669-3.236).

conclusionWhite enrollees who reported PMAD symptoms were more than twice as likely to receive a PMAD diagnosis as Black enrollees reporting PMAD symptoms. The magnitude of racial difference in PMAD diagnosis did not improve over the course of the study period. These persistent racial differences are consistent with structural barriers, provider biases, and cultural stigmas that differentially and disproportionately impact non-White patients. Tailored interventions to improve mental health care among Black Medicaid enrollees may be needed to improve PMAD diagnosis, a critical first step in mental health management. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersMood DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsAdultBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMedicaidMichiganPregnancyUnited StatesWhiteYoung AdultDiagnosisMental healthPerinatal mood and anxiety disordersRacial differences

Identifiers

PMID42118394
PMCPMC13167852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.