ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of internist-performed point-of-care ultrasound in atrial fibrillation: a multicenter study.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in internal medicine and often requires timely echocardiographic assessment. Limited availability of standard studies may delay management, particularly in acute or resource-limited settings. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study across 35 Spanish hospitals, enrolling adults with new-onset or chronic AF without echocardiography in the previous 12 months, comparing internist-performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) with blinded cardiologist-performed transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE) as the reference standard. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for structural abnormalities. Secondary outcomes included comparison with auscultation and the clinical impact of POCUS findings. Among 441 patients (mean age 80.4 ± 9.9 years; 51% women), POCUS showed good diagnostic accuracy for left ventricular (LV) dilation (sensitivity 83%, specificity 94%) and LV systolic dysfunction (sensitivity 81%, specificity 94%), and moderate accuracy for left atrial (LA) enlargement (sensitivity 91%, specificity 64%). Compared with auscultation, POCUS was significantly more accurate for detecting mitral and tricuspid disease. POCUS findings frequently prompted therapeutic adjustments, including anticoagulation in mitral stenosis, individualized rate-control strategies in LV dysfunction, diuretic titration in congestion, and referral for significant valvular disease. Pericardial effusion, though less common, strongly influenced management. Internist-performed POCUS demonstrated robust diagnostic performance in AF and directly informed bedside therapeutic decisions. Although it does not replace comprehensive echocardiography, particularly for detailed valvular assessment, it represents a valuable extension of the physical examination and may improve timely and equitable cardiac evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.