SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2026
Immediate versus staged revascularization in acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of RCTs.
Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease, it is unclear whether non-culprit lesions should be revascularized immediately or in a staged procedure. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared immediate versus staged revascularization strategies. Two authors independently screened records from the online databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible trials up to November 2025. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular events at 1 year. Meta-regressions were performed to explore the influence of study-level characteristics. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023446181). Ten trials with a total of 5651 patients were included in the final analysis. All-cause death at 1 year occurred in 109 (3.9%) of 2809 patients in the immediate revascularization group and 100 (3.5%) of 2842 patients in the staged revascularization group (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI 0.79-1.52). Cardiovascular death at 1 year occurred in 76 (2.8%) of 2749 patients in the immediate revascularization group and 66 (2.4%) of 2768 patients in the staged revascularization group. Meta-regression suggested that higher mean patient age was significantly associated with a lower risk ratio favoring the immediate revascularization group (regression coefficient -0.10; 95% CI -0.16 to -0.002; p = 0.047). All-cause mortality and cardiovascular deaths were similar in patients with ACS, predominantly with STEMI, and multivessel coronary disease undergoing immediate or staged revascularization. The available effect estimates do not exclude the possibility of clinically meaningful benefit or harm from immediate revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.