ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Pregnancy prediction in Nelore heifers using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beef cattle production systems, particularly those based on Nelore heifers in tropical regions, are under increasing pressure to improve reproductive efficiency while reducing production costs. Early identification of females with high reproductive potential remains a major challenge, especially under field conditions using routinely collected phenotypic data. This study aimed to develop and compare supervised machine learning models to predict pregnancy outcomes in Nelore heifers using growth-related traits. A dataset comprising 1,167 animals was used, including adjusted body weights at weaning (W210) and yearling (W365), average daily gain (DWG), and seasonal classification. Six algorithms were evaluated: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The ANN achieved the highest accuracy (0.83), whereas RF showed the greatest discriminative ability (AUC = 0.94), followed by XGBoost and LightGBM (AUC = 0.93). In contrast, CatBoost exhibited low discriminative capacity (AUC = 0.53). Variable importance analysis consistently identified body weight at 210 days (W210) as the most influential predictor of pregnancy. These findings demonstrate that machine learning models can effectively support early and data-driven decision-making in beef cattle systems, enabling the identification of heifers with higher reproductive potential and reducing the maintenance of non-productive females. The use of easily obtainable growth traits reinforces the applicability of this approach, contributing to more efficient and sustainable reproductive management in tropical livestock production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.