Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118370›Full record

ArticleHeart failure reviews2026

Scoping review of return to work in patients with heart failure.

Shuri Nakao, Hidehiro Someko, Masatsugu Okamura, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Tomohiko Kamo, Hirofumi Ogihara, Shinya Sato, Sokichi Maniwa

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuri NakaoDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan. shuri432@med.shimane-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0009-0001-2668-969X
Hidehiro SomekoScientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7195-2055
Masatsugu OkamuraScientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-5037
Yasushi TsujimotoScientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7214-5589
Tomohiko KamoScientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0490-8393
Hirofumi OgiharaScientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8335-2279
Shinya SatoDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-4169-1271
Sokichi ManiwaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-2209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) has a significant impact on quality of life and employment. For patients with HF of work age, return to work (RTW) is an important goal because of its social and economic significance. This scoping review aimed to investigate the definition of RTW, RTW rates, support programs, and factors associated with RTW in patients with HF, and to propose future research and clinical support strategies. We included 47 studies with 64,048 individuals: 21 cohort studies (five prospective studies, 16 retrospective studies), three cross sectional studies, three case series studies (two retrospective studies, one prospective study), 18 case reports, two qualitative studies. Participants were aged 18-65 years old and were employed prior to a diagnosis of HF. Only one study defined RTW in patients with HF, and it was described as "whether or not patients were working for income." The overall RTW rate across the studies had a median of was 56.0%, (interquartile range 25.8-100.0%, range 0.0-100.0%) but the rate varied across studies. Support programs were reported in two studies as rehabilitation and in one study as paid leave. The facilitating and inhibiting factors of RTW were classified into medical factors (e.g., ejection fraction, comorbidities), social determinants of health (e.g., education, income), and employment or work-related factors (e.g., job type, work ability). Future research needs to consider the results of this scoping review, particularly the ambiguity in the definition of RTW and the facilitating and inhibiting factors identified.

Indexed as

Heart FailureQuality of LifeReturn to WorkEmploymentHumansFacilitating factorHeart failureInhibiting factorReturn to workScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42118370
PMCPMC13167886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.