SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Obturator hernia in adults: a systematic review of CT diagnosis and surgical management.
Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObturator hernia is a rare but life-threatening pelvic floor hernia occurring predominantly in elderly, underweight women and is associated with delayed diagnosis and high perioperative mortality. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT), factors associated with bowel resection, and short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair in adults.
methodsA systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from January 2004 to January 2026. Studies reporting at least three surgically confirmed adult cases were eligible. Three consecutive institutional cases were incorporated as an illustrative clinical adjunct.
resultsTwenty-two studies including 876 patients were analysed. The mean age across included studies was 79.7 years; 91.5% were female. Reported preoperative CT sensitivity across included studies was 93.2% (range 66.7-100%). Bowel resection was required in 31.6% and was associated with higher 30-day mortality (19.6% vs. 3.9%). Laparoscopic repair appeared to be associated with lower wound morbidity, shorter hospital stay (5.3 vs. 12.6 days), and lower recurrence (0% vs. 2.8%) in selected patient cohorts, although case-mix differences preclude direct comparison. Mesh was used in 44.3% overall. In three institutional cases (all elderly cachectic women presenting emergently), one underwent TAPP and two underwent open midline laparotomy; primary suture repair was performed in all owing to contamination, bowel compromise, or extreme frailty.
conclusionCT remains the diagnostic cornerstone in obturator hernia. Surgical strategy should be individualised based on haemodynamic status, contamination, and frailty. Reported outcomes represent descriptive trends rather than pooled statistical estimates due to heterogeneity of available data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.