ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Developing a core outcome set for the NeuroPoint Alliance Quality Outcomes Database Pediatric Tumor Surgery Registry: a modified Delphi study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProspective, multi-institutional surgical data collection in pediatric neuro-oncology remains limited despite substantial variation in operative and perioperative management across institutions. To address this, we are developing the NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) Pediatric Tumor Surgery Registry. Here, we used a modified Delphi process to define a core outcome set for the registry.
methodsA modified Delphi study was conducted among pediatric neurosurgeons serving as site principal investigators for the proposed registry. Candidate data elements were rated on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus for inclusion was predefined as ≥70% of respondents rating an item 7-9 and ≤15% rating it 1-3; consensus for exclusion was defined as the reverse. Items not reaching consensus in Round 1, along with new items derived from free-text responses, were re-evaluated in Round 2. Near-consensus items after Round 2 underwent discussion and re-rating in a final virtual round.
resultsIn Round 1, 48 of 83 candidate items (57.8%) reached consensus for inclusion, while 35 advanced to Round 2. Fourteen additional candidate items were generated from free-text suggestions, resulting in 49 items evaluated in Round 2; 13 reached consensus for inclusion. Seventeen items were classified as near-consensus and advanced to the final round, in which 4 reached consensus for inclusion and 1 for exclusion. Across all three rounds, 66 items achieved consensus.
conclusionsThis modified Delphi study established a consensus-based core outcome set for the NPA QOD Pediatric Tumor Surgery Registry, providing a practical foundation for standardized, prospective, multicenter pediatric neurosurgical oncology data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.