SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Chronic pain after Shouldice versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Lichtenstein (mesh) and Shouldice (non-mesh) techniques are the main options for open inguinal hernia repair. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the prevalence of chronic postoperative pain between them.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies comparing the prevalence of chronic pain after Shouldice and Lichtenstein techniques in adult patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan and the effect model was determined based on heterogeneity, assessed by the I² statistic. Subgroup analyses were conducted by mean follow-up duration and study design.
resultsTen studies with 4,122 patients (59.8% Lichtenstein) were included. Shouldice repair was associated with a 34% relative risk reduction in chronic postoperative pain compared to Lichtenstein (RR 0.66; 95%CI 0.56-0.78; p < 0.00001; I² = 5%). Conversely, the Shouldice technique demonstrated a higher risk of long-term hernia recurrence (RR 2.54; 95%CI 1.15-5.63; p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding early postoperative complications (RR 1.01; 95%CI 0.85-1.19; p = 0.95) or mean operative time (MD 5.96 min; 95%CI -0.79 to 12.71; p = 0.08).
conclusionAlthough the Lichtenstein repair is more widely practiced, the Shouldice technique yields significantly lower rates of chronic postoperative pain, albeit with a higher risk of long-term recurrence. This trade-off highlights Shouldice as a potential alternative in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.