ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026
Theoretical study on the mechanism of 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives based on ESIPT and TICT as fluorescent probes for detecting Cu
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextIn recent years, fluorescent probe molecular technology has received increasing attention. However, the mechanism by which fluorescent probe molecules detect ions still requires further study. This research explores the sensing mechanism of the 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivative 2-(5-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) phenol (L-E) as a highly selective fluorescent probe for Cu
methodsThe structures of the studied compounds in ground (S
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.