Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118331›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Outcomes of inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians: A propensity score-matched analysis of the Herniamed Registry.

Ralph Lorenz, J Conze, R Fortelny, F Köckerling, F Mayer, H Niebuhr, W Reinpold, B Stechemesser, R Wiessner, D Adolf and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ralph LorenzHernia Center 3+CHIRURGEN, Klosterstrasse 34/35, 13581, Berlin, Germany. lorenz@3chirurgen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-3005
J ConzeUM Hernienzentrum Dr. Conze, Arabellastraße 17, 81925, München, Germany.
R FortelnyDepartment of General Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, Vienna, A- 1160, Austria.
F KöckerlingHernia Center, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité, University Medicine, Am Nordgraben 2, 13509, Berlin, Germany.
F MayerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
H NiebuhrHamburger Hernien Centrum, Eppendorfer Baum 8, 20249, Hamburg, Germany.
W ReinpoldHamburger Hernien Centrum, Harburg (an der Helios Mariahilf Klinik), Stader Str. 203c, 21075, Hamburg, Germany.
B StechemesserHernia Center Cologne, PAN-Klinik, Zeppelinstrasse 1, 50667, Cologne, Germany.
R WiessnerDepartment of General Surgery, Kardinal Schwarzenberg Klinikum, Schwarzach im Pongau, Austria.
D AdolfStatConsult GmbH, Am Fuchsberg 11, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ch PaaschDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increasing life expectancy, a growing proportion of inguinal hernia repairs is performed in elderly patients. Evidence regarding perioperative safety and long-term outcomes in octogenarians remains limited. This study compared perioperative outcomes and one-year follow-up between patients aged < 80 and ≥ 80 years using data from the Herniamed Registry.

methodsA total of 394,309 fully documented unilateral primary inguinal hernia repairs with valid one-year follow-up were extracted from the Herniamed Registry (data export October 2025). After applying predefined inclusion and plausibility criteria, 45,576 patients aged ≥ 80 years and 348,733 patients aged < 80 years were eligible for analysis. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed using demographic, hernia-related, surgical, and comorbidity variables, with exact matching for sex, surgical approach, and procedure type. Outcomes included intraoperative, general, and postoperative complications, complication-related reoperations, and one-year endpoints (pain at rest, pain on exertion, pain requiring treatment, recurrence, trocar hernia, secondary hemorrhage, seroma, and infection). McNemar's test and odds ratios were used for statistical comparison.

resultsBefore matching, octogenarians more frequently underwent emergency surgery (6.8% vs. 2.1%), presented with scrotal or femoral hernias, and were more often treated under local or spinal anesthesia. Propensity score matching yielded 44,550 matched pairs. After matching, patients aged ≥ 80 years showed significantly higher rates of general and postoperative complications, reoperations, secondary hemorrhage, and infection. Conversely, one-year pain outcomes and recurrence rates were significantly lower in octogenarians. No significant differences were observed for intraoperative complications, trocar hernia, or seroma.

conclusionsOctogenarians undergoing inguinal hernia repair exhibit increased perioperative risk but favorable one-year outcomes regarding pain and recurrence. These findings support the overall safety and effectiveness of inguinal hernia repair in advanced age, provided that perioperative risk is carefully managed. Elective surgery should not be withheld solely due to age, and early intervention may reduce the risk of emergency presentations and improve postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyOctogenariansPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMalePropensity ScoreRecurrenceRegistriesReoperationTreatment OutcomeGeriatric patientsGroin herniasHernia characteristicsInguinal herniaOctagenarians

Identifiers

PMID42118331
PMCPMC13167829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.