Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118311›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026

Objective versus subjective physical activity assessment in a clinical setting of patients with obesity and eating disorders : A concurrent validity study.

Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Bettina Bannert, Elmar Kaiser, Patrick Kutschar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hans-Peter WiesingerInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health and Healthcare Research, Paracelsus Medical Private University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. hans-peter.wiesinger@pmu.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8526-2832
Bettina BannertPsychosomatic Clinic Eggenburg, Eggenburg, Austria.
Elmar KaiserPsychosomatic Clinic Eggenburg, Eggenburg, Austria.
Patrick KutscharInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, Center for Public Health and Healthcare Research, Paracelsus Medical Private University, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccurate assessment of physical activity supports a comprehensive understanding and treatment of obesity and eating disorders. Here, we assessed the concurrent validity of a questionnaire and accelerometry-based measurements in a clinical setting.

methodsFrom 2020 to 2022 a total of 23 patients from a psychosomatic clinic participated (21 with unspecified eating disorders, 2 with bulimia nervosa). During the 3rd to 4th week of the clinical stay patients completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form and wore an accelerometer-based multisensory device (SenseWear® Armband, SWA) for 7 days. Outcome measures included total physical activity (MET min·w

resultsThe questionnaire overestimated physical activity by ~40% (+394 MET min·week

conclusionObjective accelerometer-based multisensory device monitoring should be incorporated into clinical settings to treat patients with obesity and eating disorders.

Indexed as

Accelerometer-based multisensor deviceConcurrent validityExercise therapyIPAQSelf-report bias

Identifiers

PMID42118311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.