Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118310›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies for cluster headache: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Muneeb Ahmad Muneer, Ishita Gupta, Areesha Mansoor, Poorvikha S, Debankur Dey, Diya Rathi, Malavika Rudrakumar, Amogh Verma, Rachana Mehta, Ranjana Sah and 1 more

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muneeb Ahmad MuneerAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5653-1931
Ishita GuptaAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Areesha MansoorDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Poorvikha SSt. John Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Debankur DeyMedical College Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Diya RathiDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Malavika RudrakumarSt. John Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Amogh VermaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rama Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, 245304, India. amoghverma2000@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-4874
Rachana MehtaManav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, 121004, India.
Ranjana SahDr. D. Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed-to-Be-University), Pimpri, Pune, 411018, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8332-6391
Mohamad EzzeldinUniversity of Houston, HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCluster headache (CH) is a severe unilateral trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia with limited well tolerated therapies. Calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies, including galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab, have established efficacy in migraine and are under evaluation in CH. This study assesses their efficacy and safety using pairwise and network meta analysis.

methodsPubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through April 2025. Randomized controlled trials enrolling adults with episodic or chronic CH were included. The primary endpoint was change in weekly attack frequency. Secondary outcomes included subtype specific effects and adverse events. Frequentist random effects network meta analysis and pairwise meta analysis were performed in R.

resultsFive trials with approximately 1,000 participants were included. No agent demonstrated statistically significant reduction in weekly attack frequency versus placebo, although consistent numerical improvements were observed. Dose specific network estimates showed mean differences of - 0.81 for galcanezumab 300 mg, - 0.17 for eptinezumab 400 mg, 0.71 for fremanezumab 675/225 mg, and - 1.27 for fremanezumab 900/225 mg. Pooled dose estimates were - 0.81 for galcanezumab, - 0.27 for fremanezumab, and - 0.17 for eptinezumab. Pairwise meta analysis yielded a pooled mean difference of - 0.41. Subgroup analysis indicated minimal change in chronic CH and greater numerical reduction in episodic CH.

conclusionCGRP monoclonal antibodies demonstrate modest directional reductions in attack frequency without statistical significance. Signals appear more pronounced in episodic CH, supporting the need for adequately powered, subtype specific trials.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCluster HeadacheRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptidefremanezumabgalcanezumabCalcitonin gene-related peptideCGRP monoclonal antibodiesChronic cluster headacheCluster headacheEpisodic cluster headacheEptinezumabFremanezumabGalcanezumabHeadache preventionNetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.