Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118288›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

The promise of artificial intelligence in diagnostic breast pathology.

Shahla Masood, Mohsin Jamal, Aliaksandr Obukhau, Carmen Smotherman, Tasnuva Rashid, Zoobia Khan, Noor Marji

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shahla MasoodDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA. shahla.masood@jax.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-4342
Mohsin JamalDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Aliaksandr ObukhauDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Carmen SmothermanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Tasnuva RashidDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Zoobia KhanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Noor MarjiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate pathology diagnosis has remained the most essential factor in providing optimal breast cancer care across the globe. Core needle biopsies account for a significant portion of pathologists' workload, yet diagnostic variability remains especially for several difficult to diagnose entities such as borderline proliferative breast disease, atypical and low-grade breast lesions. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging tools that may help address these diagnostic challenges. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Pathology Artificial Intelligence Guidance Engine Breast (Paige PaBr), an AI tool, in analyzing digital histology images for breast cancer diagnosis, a retrospective study of 250 digitized breast biopsy images scanned at the University of Florida Jacksonville was conducted. AI-generated diagnoses were compared with reference diagnoses by experienced pathologists. Agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for suspicious for cancer and invasive lesions, respectively. For detection of suspicious lesions, AI showed 90.0% raw agreement with Cohen's kappa of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.69-0.86), sensitivity of 90.2%, and specificity of 89.5%. For invasive breast cancer specifically, Cohen's kappa was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90). Of 76 invasive cases, 74 (97.4%) were correctly identified by AI. Among 98 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and other proliferative lesions, 84 (85.7%) were classified as non-invasive, indicating high specificity. In summary, AI demonstrated substantial concordance with expert pathologists. These findings suggest that AI may serve as an adjunctive tool to support the evaluation of breast biopsies. Continued validation and prospective assessment are warranted to further define its potential role in routine pathology practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAtypical Ductal HyperplasiaBreast biopsyBreast cancerDuctal Carcinoma in Situ

Identifiers

PMID42118288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.