ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
The promise of artificial intelligence in diagnostic breast pathology.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence as an Assistive Tool in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis in the Digital Era.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate pathology diagnosis has remained the most essential factor in providing optimal breast cancer care across the globe. Core needle biopsies account for a significant portion of pathologists' workload, yet diagnostic variability remains especially for several difficult to diagnose entities such as borderline proliferative breast disease, atypical and low-grade breast lesions. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging tools that may help address these diagnostic challenges. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Pathology Artificial Intelligence Guidance Engine Breast (Paige PaBr), an AI tool, in analyzing digital histology images for breast cancer diagnosis, a retrospective study of 250 digitized breast biopsy images scanned at the University of Florida Jacksonville was conducted. AI-generated diagnoses were compared with reference diagnoses by experienced pathologists. Agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for suspicious for cancer and invasive lesions, respectively. For detection of suspicious lesions, AI showed 90.0% raw agreement with Cohen's kappa of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.69-0.86), sensitivity of 90.2%, and specificity of 89.5%. For invasive breast cancer specifically, Cohen's kappa was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90). Of 76 invasive cases, 74 (97.4%) were correctly identified by AI. Among 98 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and other proliferative lesions, 84 (85.7%) were classified as non-invasive, indicating high specificity. In summary, AI demonstrated substantial concordance with expert pathologists. These findings suggest that AI may serve as an adjunctive tool to support the evaluation of breast biopsies. Continued validation and prospective assessment are warranted to further define its potential role in routine pathology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.