ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation and associations with attention and processing speed in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), its effects on cognitive functions are controversial. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare attention and processing speed in PD patients with STN-DBS and those receiving medical therapy, using a multimodal assessment combining P300 event-related potentials and neuropsychological tests. The study included 20 PD patients who underwent STN DBS and 17 PD patients who were followed with medical treatment. Demographic and clinical data for all patients were recorded. Cognitive functions were assessed using the P300 potential, the Stroop test (ST), and the Serial Digit Learning Test (SDLT). P300 potential latency and amplitude values, as well as neuropsychometric test results, were statistically compared between the two groups. P300 latency was shorter in the DBS-treated group than in the non-DBS group (p = 0.004). Performance times on Part III of the ST were shorter in the DBS-treated group (p = 0.03). In addition, a higher proportion of patients in the DBS-treated group performed normally on Part I of the ST compared to the non-DBS group (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the two groups in SDLT results. Shorter P300 latency and subtle differences in ST performance suggest a potential association between STN-DBS and the cognitive domains of attention and processing speed. Combining neuropsychological and electrophysiological assessments could provide a more comprehensive evaluation, and future large-scale, longitudinal studies are needed to clarify domain-specific cognitive effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.