Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118252›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Regenerative therapies with interfaces between rehabilitation, working life, and geriatrics-example of extracorporeal shock wave therapy].

Richard Crevenna

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard CrevennaUniversitätsklinik für Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitation und Arbeitsmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien, Wien, Österreich. richard.crevenna@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundESWT is a safe, evidence-based, and effective procedure that has proven itself in almost all areas of medical care. To ensure high-quality use of this effective method, it is essential that it is applied in accordance with the applicable standards. METHODOLOGY: Traditional, narrative review.

resultsThe increasing proportion of physically demanding occupations, increasing lack of exercise, (over)aging of the population, and work intensification are leading to an increasing number of tendinopathies, myofascial dysfunctions, and chronic pain conditions. In this context, ESWT is becoming a relevant tool in modern, function-oriented occupational, preventive, rehabilitative, and geriatric medicine. ESWT usually acts as an "enabler" and "accelerator", i.e., a biological activator of functional processes. ESWT is not a passive procedure, but rather an activator that often enables functional treatments through pain reduction and regenerative effects. ESWT combines regeneration, prevention, rehabilitation, mobility, participation, and economic sustainability and will continue to gain importance in an aging society.

conclusionsESWT can be highly relevant in multimodal applications in prevention, rehabilitation, occupational medicine, geriatrics, and nursing care. Increased use of ESWT in prevention, rehabilitation, occupational medicine, and geriatrics, with reimbursement by the public health system, should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyGeriatricsRegenerative MedicineAgedHumansTreatment OutcomeAbility to workChronic painGeriatricsNursing careRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42118252
PMCPMC13309435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.