Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118245›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

A systematic study of WGA strategies for enhanced STR and SNP genotyping on trace DNA.

Ya Li, Weifen Sun, Man Chen, Bonan Dong, Jiangwei Yan, Xiling Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ya Li *Department of Forensic Genetics, College of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030600, People's Republic of China.
Weifen Sun *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, 200063, People's Republic of China.
Man ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, 200063, People's Republic of China.
Bonan DongShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, 200063, People's Republic of China.
Jiangwei YanDepartment of Forensic Genetics, College of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030600, People's Republic of China. yanjw@sxmu.edu.cn.
Xiling LiuShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, 200063, People's Republic of China. liuxl@ssfjd.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1318-6150

Funding

Ministry of Finance of China GY2025C-4Ministry of Finance of China GY2025T-1National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471921Shanghai Leading Talent Program of Eastern Talent Plan LJ2024051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The robust analysis of trace DNA (≤ 100 pg) remains a persistent challenge in forensic genetics, primarily due to the high failure rates and stochastic effects associated with conventional STR typing at low template quantities. Although whole genome amplification (WGA) offers a potential solution, its effectiveness and influencing factors in forensic applications still require systematic evaluation. This study comprehensively evaluated two prominent WGA methods-REPLI-g and MALBAC-for STR and SNP genotyping of trace DNA across a wide input range (0.2441-2000 pg) on both capillary electrophoresis (CE) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). REPLI-g consistently produced high yields (average 37.40 μg) with excellent stutter stability (~ 0.1), proving optimal for intact to moderately degraded samples (≥ 31.25 pg). Although MALBAC yielded less, it demonstrated superior sensitivity for ultra-low inputs (< 20 pg), retaining 21.37% SNP accuracy even at 0.2441 pg. In general, on the NGS platform, both methods significantly increased sequencing depth and reduced allele drop-out at critical low inputs. By further exploring the factors influencing the effectiveness of WGA-based DNA genotyping, we identified amplicon length as a key factor, with effective amplification and typing achieved particularly when the amplified fragment length was ≤ 300 bp. These observations established an evidence-based framework for WGA selection in trace evidence typing. Combining a contextually chosen WGA method with targeted NGS and short-amplicon assays provides a promising workflow for recovering interpretable genotypes from single-source trace evidence that would otherwise be unanalyzable.

Indexed as

DNADNA FingerprintingGenotyping TechniquesMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideElectrophoresis, CapillaryGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNAForensic genotypingLow template quantity (LTQ)Next-generation sequencing (NGS)Trace DNA analysisWhole genome amplification (WGA)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.