ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Preventing Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial of Proactive Care With Versus Without Psychoeducation.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04863872 (Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Preventing Severe Hypoglycemia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Preventing Severe Hypoglycemia
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere hypoglycemia is a feared complication of diabetes treatment. While psychoeducational programs reduce severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes, their effectiveness is unclear in type 2 diabetes (T2D). OBJECTIVE AND
designThe Preventing Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes (PHT2) randomized trial compared (a) proactive nurse care management (PC) and (b) PC augmented with my hypo compass for adults with T2D, a psychoeducational intervention (PC+).
participantsAdults with T2D on insulin or sulfonylurea and with a severe event in the prior 12 months or impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome was self-reported severe hypoglycemia over 12 months, assessed at 14 months. KEY
resultsNinety-two percent (n = 230) of 259 participants (67.2 ± 10.6 years; 61% women) completed the trial. The proportion reporting ≥ 1 severe hypoglycemia event in the 12 months before baseline was 34.1% in the PC arm and 24.8% in the PC + arm. At 14 months, severe hypoglycemia did not differ significantly between arms (16.1% PC vs 11.6% PC + ; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.72 [95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 1.30]; adjusted absolute risk difference [aARD] -4.6 [95% confidence interval, -13.0 to 3.7]). Level 2 hypoglycemic events (glucose < 54 mg/dL for ≥ 15 min) were less frequent in the PC+ arm on the absolute risk scale but not on the relative risk scale (aRR 0.46 [95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 1.03]; aARD, -11.3% [95% confidence interval, -21.7 to -0.8]). No other secondary measures differed significantly between arms.
conclusionsAdding psychoeducational training to proactive care did not significantly reduce self-reported severe hypoglycemia compared to proactive care alone, with both groups experiencing a 50% reduction in severe hypoglycemia. Results should be interpreted with caution due to limited power.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04863872.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.