SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2026
Optimal timing of ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion relative to cranioplasty post-decompressive craniectomy: a frequentist network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOptimal timing of ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) relative to cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy remains controversial. VPS may be performed before, during, or after CP, but no consensus exists on which sequence minimizes complications. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the safety profiles of pre-, simultaneous, and post-CP shunting.
methodsWe searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to October 2025. Eligible studies directly compared at least two timing strategies in patients undergoing both CP and VPS. Primary outcomes included overall complications, reoperation, infection, and intradural bleeding. Secondary outcomes included shunt-related and other procedure-specific adverse events. We used a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis with Mantel-Haenszel pooling. Transitivity and consistency were assessed using design-by-treatment interaction modeling and node-splitting. Certainty of evidence was graded using CINeMA.
resultsTen observational studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 532 patients: 291 (54.7%) pre-CP VPS, 156 (29.3%) simultaneous CP-VPS, and 85 (16.0%) post-CP VPS. Simultaneous CP-VPS was associated with a significantly higher overall complication risk compared with post-CP VPS (RR 2.07; 95% CI 1.16-3.71; P < 0.05). Risk of reoperation (68/386, 17.6%), infection (62/532, 11.7%), and intradural bleeding (22/509, 2.8%) did not differ significantly across timing strategies. Secondary outcomes were infrequently reported and showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Inter-study heterogeneity and network inconsistency were low. Certainty of evidence for the main comparison (simultaneous versus post-CP VPS) was rated high.
conclusionSimultaneous CP-VPS carried a higher composite complication risk than post-CP VPS, whereas staged strategies (VPS followed by CP or CP followed by VPS) demonstrated broadly comparable risk of infection, reoperation, and hemorrhage. These findings support a staged reconstruction paradigm in which CP is performed first to restore intracranial compliance and CSF hydrodynamics, with VPS reserved for persistent or progressive hydrocephalus rather than being routinely inserted at the time of CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.