SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Open versus laparoscopic repair in pediatric incarcerated inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe optimal surgical approach for pediatric incarcerated inguinal hernia remains controversial. This study aimed to systematically compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic repair (LH) and open repair (OH) in children with incarcerated inguinal hernia through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to March 2026. Comparative studies evaluating LH versus OH in pediatric incarcerated inguinal hernia were included. Primary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative injury, wound infection, testicular atrophy, and recurrence. Pooled mean differences (MD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Review Manager 5.4.
resultsNine studies involving 584 pediatric patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with OH, LH was associated with significantly shorter operative time and reduced intraoperative blood loss. The length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the LH group. In addition, LH showed a significantly lower risk of intraoperative injury and recurrence. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of wound infection or testicular atrophy.
conclusionsLaparoscopic repair appears to be a safe and effective alternative to open repair for pediatric incarcerated inguinal hernia. Further high-quality prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42118158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.