ArticleAnimal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho
Maize Silage Associated With Hay From Xerophytic Plants in Lamb Feeding: Intake, Digestibility, and Economic Feasibility.
Article in Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the partial inclusion of 25% hay from xerophytic plants in maize silage in feedlot lamb in the semiarid region. Non-defined breed male lambs were used in a completely randomized design, with five experimental units per treatment. The treatments consisted of four diets: maize silage (SM), maize silage with gliricidia hay (SMG), maize silage with pornunça hay (SMP), and maize silage with leucaena hay (SML). The SM diet showed higher in vivo dry matter digestibility (70.35%), whereas SM and SMG recorded the highest NDF digestibility values (60.31% and 57.10%). Average daily gain was higher in the SM and SMG diets (180 g day
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.