Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118099›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2026

Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery: The QUACS Study and Benefit Prediction Model.

Samer A M Nashef, James Willard, Christine Mills, Yi-Da Chiu, Philip Noyes, Michael C Petch, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Stephen R Large

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04231461 (Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04231461 completednot on this map

Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorPapworth Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRan2019 to 2024Enrolled2,925ConditionsAortic Valve Stenosis, Mitral Valve Disease, Tricuspid Valve Disease, Aorta DiseaseArmsCardiac Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samer A M NashefDepartment of Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0AY, United Kingdom.
James WillardMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.
Christine MillsPapworth Trial Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0AY, United Kingdom.
Yi-Da ChiuPapworth Trial Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0AY, United Kingdom.
Philip NoyesPapworth Trial Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0AY, United Kingdom.
Michael C PetchDepartment of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Trust, Lynn PE30 4ET, United Kingdom.
Dominique-Laurent CouturierMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.
Stephen R LargeDepartment of Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0AY, United Kingdom.

Funding

JP Moulton Charitable Foundation TRIPOD NCT04231461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSafer cardiac surgery is being offered to more high-risk and frail patients, improving both survival and quality of life (QoL) for most. The QoL After Cardiac Surgery Study (QUACS) evaluated QoL changes postoperatively to identify those who do not benefit from and may be harmed by intervention.

methodsModerate- and high-risk cardiac surgery patients enrolled in a prospective, national multicentre study (2019-2023). Mortality risk, frailty, outlook, affect, and socio-economic status were objectively measured. Quality of life was assessed preoperatively and to 12-24 months postoperatively.

resultsParticipants were 2948 patients (EuroSCORE II ≥3 or logistic EuroSCORE ≥6, mean age 72.9 years, female 39.6%). Inclusion criteria were not met in 186 patients, leaving 2762 for analysis. Hospital mortality was 3.93% and 5.86% died after discharge. At 1 year after surgery, net QoL benefit was achieved in 74% of symptomatic patients and in 18% of patients thought asymptomatic. Risk factors for failure to achieve a net QoL benefit were identified, and a preoperative QoL calculator was developed to quantify the likelihood of QoL benefit.

conclusionsThis first study examining QoL changes over time after complex major intervention such as cardiac surgery confirms that some patients do not obtain QoL benefit and helps to identify them. Findings and methodology are applicable to a wide range of major operations. The QUACS Study will improve the process of informed consent and decision-making by patients contemplating such procedures and reduce harmful interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04231461 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04231461).

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscardiac surgeryquality of liferisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42118099
PMCPMC13181181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.