ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
An Interactive Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Framework to Evaluate Bedaquiline Dose Modifications in Adults With Tuberculosis.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bedaquiline pharmacokinetics in drug-resistant tuberculosis: from exposure variability to individualized therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bedaquiline is approved for use in a thrice-weekly dosing schedule; simpler once-daily dosing strategies could enable fixed-dose combinations and improve patient adherence. We developed an interactive R Shiny simulation tool to enable the evaluation of different bedaquiline dosing schedules within an integrated dose-pharmacokinetic-efficacy-safety-outcome framework. Four models describing bedaquiline and its metabolite M2 concentrations, time-to-positivity sputum culture results, QTc intervals, and long-term outcomes were incorporated in the framework. A virtual population representative of tuberculosis patients was generated for simulation. Two case studies were investigated: (1) alternative bedaquiline dosing regimens and (2) bedaquiline treatment interruption and reinitiation. The ZeNix once-daily dosing (200 mg once daily for 8 weeks, followed by 100 mg once daily for 16 weeks) yielded 50% lower median bedaquiline and M2 weekly average concentrations compared to the registered (approved) and standard-loading once-daily dosing (400 mg once daily for 2 weeks, followed by 100 mg once daily for 22 weeks) at 2 weeks. The exposure difference was predicted to lead to 11% fewer patients with negative cultures at 2 weeks and 5.8% fewer patients having sputum culture conversions at 8 weeks under the ZeNix dosing. The QTcF intervals were predicted from 376 to 442 ms (5th to 95th percentile of the population) for the three evaluated strategies. We also demonstrated that the Shiny application could guide decisions on the timing and doses for reloading bedaquiline after treatment interruption. The developed Shiny platform supports future exploration of bedaquiline treatment under different scenarios, for example, potential drug-drug interactions and clinical trial simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.