Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42117887›Full record

ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2026

Advancing forward osmosis predictions: A deep learning-based surrogate modeling approach.

Hyeon Woo Park, Woo-Ju Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyeon Woo ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Ju KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2024-00406525 and RS-2026-25484846)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study presents a deep learning-based surrogate model for the rapid and accurate prediction of forward osmosis (FO) performance under diverse operating conditions. To assess the applicability of data-driven approaches, several machine learning models - decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and deep neural network (DNN) - were developed and compared systematically using datasets of varying sizes.

resultsModel performance depended strongly on dataset size. The DNN-based surrogate achieved superior accuracy when trained with more than 1563 data points, whereas the random forest model performed better with smaller datasets (<1563). Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis showed that the DNN model captured the physical relationships between input parameters and FO performance effectively. The DNN-based surrogate predicted experimental water flux with a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.082, which was comparable with that of the numerical simulation model of 0.083.

conclusionThe proposed DNN-based surrogate model maintains high predictive accuracy while substantially reducing computational time compared with the numerical simulation approach, enabling rapid and efficient process optimization in food manufacturing. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

Deep LearningData AnalyticsOsmosisPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSoft ComputingSupport Vector MachineWaterWaterdeep neural networkforward osmosismachine learningsurrogate model

Identifiers

PMID42117887
PMCPMC13341056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.