ArticleBiology2026
A Neuro-Symbolic Bioinformatics Framework for Unlocking Chordate Physiological Dark Data and Validating Allometric Scaling.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal functional trait data are essential for macroecology, but massive datasets remain locked in unstructured scientific literature. Traditional manual extraction is inefficient, and general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems struggle with complex biological tables and numerical accuracy. To address this bioinformatics challenge, we propose a multimodal neuro-symbolic framework combining visual-language perception and code-based reasoning. This approach reconstructs complex document layouts and delegates biostatistical calculations, such as unit normalization and thermodynamic energy conversion, to an isolated programming environment to ensure mathematical and statistical consistency. By mining literature spanning 117 years, we constructed a high-fidelity physiological database for 1632 chordate species. Our method achieved a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.935 in extracting biophysical fields. External benchmarking against a curated mammalian trait database showed strong concordance for shared body-mass and metabolic-rate traits, while our database retained record-level provenance and physiological context. Furthermore, the extracted data reproduced classic allometric scaling relationships for basal metabolic rate and brain volume while preserving physiological adaptations, supporting the biological plausibility of the dataset. This study validates a reproducible bioinformatics pipeline that minimizes extraction artifacts and substantially reduces downstream mathematical and statistical conversion errors, while providing a scalable, complementary resource for building physiology-oriented trait databases from historical literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.