Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42117834›Full record

ArticleBiology2026

Computer Vision-Assisted Semiautomatic Analysis of Zooplankton in a Longitudinal Study of the Ecological State of Lake Baikal.

Olga Olegovna Rusanovskaya, Sergey Sergeevich Oreshkov, Anastasiya Andreevna Demidova, Taysia Pavlovna Rzhepka, Eugene Anatolyevich Silow, Nickolai Vasilyevich Shadrin, Svetlana Vladimirovna Shimaraeva, Maxim Anatolyevich Timofeyev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olga Olegovna RusanovskayaInstitute of Lake Baikal Biology, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk 664003, Russia.
Sergey Sergeevich OreshkovMaritimeAI, Kaliningrad 236000, Russia.
Anastasiya Andreevna DemidovaInstitute of Lake Baikal Biology, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk 664003, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7448-0199
Taysia Pavlovna RzhepkaInstitute of Lake Baikal Biology, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk 664003, Russia.
Eugene Anatolyevich SilowInstitute of Lake Baikal Biology, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk 664003, Russia.
Nickolai Vasilyevich ShadrinA.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of Southern Seas of RAS, Sevastopol 299011, Russia.
Svetlana Vladimirovna ShimaraevaInstitute of Lake Baikal Biology, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk 664003, Russia.
Maxim Anatolyevich TimofeyevInstitute of Lake Baikal Biology, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk 664003, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5250-6818

Funding

Foundation for Support of Applied Ecological Studies «Lake Baikal» № ФОБ 02-3/60 от 19.03.2025 г.Russian Science Foundation 24-66-00001Yandex (Russia) id - dn2ugtsk0tdgvhabmc1s
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying zooplankton in freshwater ecosystems is crucial for ecological research, providing insight into ecosystem health, biodiversity, and water quality. This study focuses on developing a hybrid approach for studying and analyzing zooplankton communities using machine learning and human expert analysis. The goal of the study was to automate the labor-intensive process of zooplankton analysis as part of a long-term Lake Baikal monitoring program (since 1945), while maintaining continuity with traditional methods. A software and algorithmic system were developed to automate the analysis: images were processed using a two-stage pipeline (object detection using YOLO V11, classification using metric learning and visual transformers), and complex cases and new species were sent to specialists for verification. Over 240,000 images from 811 samples were processed, and models are updated using verified data to adapt to seasonal changes. An updatable database of labeled zooplankton images suitable for statistical analysis and research has been created. A comparison of manual and machine analysis revealed no significant differences in species composition, with accurate detection in 87% of images. This approach allows for scalable monitoring and the accumulation of labeled data arrays for the development of computer vision methods and the assessment of the state of Lake Baikal's ecosystem.

Indexed as

computer visiondeep neural networkshuman-in-the-loopLake Baikalmetric learningzooplankton

Identifiers

PMID42117834
PMCPMC13162673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.