ReviewBiology2026
A Historical Review of Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide and Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide in Sepsis.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) have emerged as potent modulators of immune responses during sepsis, yet their roles remain complex, alternating between protective and permissive depending on timing, tissue compartment, and inflammatory context. This review presents a historical assessment of VIP and PACAP in sepsis research, highlighting the evolution of conceptual advances across five decades. Starting in the 1980s, early studies revealed that VIP levels rise during endotoxemia and correlated with hypotension and mortality, suggesting a deleterious role. By the 1990s, research pivoted toward understanding gut-derived VIP and its interaction with nitric oxide, culminating in the classification of VIP and PACAP as "macrophage deactivating factors" that downregulate TNFα and IL-6. The 2000s further clarified their cell-specific actions through VPAC1/2 and PAC1 receptors, showing anti-inflammatory effects on both innate and adaptive immune cells, while illuminating delivery challenges overcome by liposomal encapsulation. The 2010s expanded this narrative by dissecting receptor dynamics, gut barrier regulation, and VIP's role in neuroimmune crosstalk and thrombo-inflammation. Most recently, studies in the 2020s provide a nuanced view of how VIP suppresses inflammatory damage but also enables pathogen persistence during live bacterial infection, implicating VIP signaling in trade-offs between tolerance and clearance. Across this chronological framework, VIP and PACAP have oscillated between friend, foe, and frenemy, underscoring the importance of context in leveraging their therapeutic potential in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.