ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Training in Gabor Orientation Identification Optimizes the Temporal Window of Adults With Anisometropic Amblyopia.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to explore the mechanisms of perceptual learning (PL) in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Methods: Twelve amblyopic patients (mean age: 25.6 ± 1.04 years) and 12 normal participants (23.6 ± 0.43 years) were recruited. All participants were trained with a Gabor orientation identification task. Before and after training, visual acuity (VA) and the contrast thresholds in the task were measured under five different external noise conditions. The elaborated perceptual template model (ePTM) was adopted to probe learning mechanisms. Seven amblyopic participants (7/12) were retested three years after completion of training. Results: The amblyopic group exhibited enhanced VA and reduced contrast thresholds across all noise conditions, whereas the normal group showed a reduction in contrast threshold under one noise condition. ePTM analysis revealed that PL reduced internal additive noise by 8.72 ± 1.32 dB and 14.81 ± 0.66 dB and lowered the peak amplitude of the temporal window by 3.78 ± 0.74 dB and 1.35 ± 0.42 dB, in the amblyopic and normal groups, respectively. Interestingly, only the amblyopic group exhibited a significant sharpening of the temporal window (P = 0.033). Three-year follow-up showed that approximately 80% of VA improvement and 63% of the contrast-threshold reduction were retained. Conclusions: PL significantly enhanced VA and reduced contrast thresholds in anisometropic amblyopia. Internal noise reduction contributed to the learning effects in both groups, and further temporal window optimization accounted for additional improvements in the amblyopic group. Performance improvements were largely maintained three years after training, supporting PL as a promising therapeutic approach for amblyopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.