ArticleJournal of vision2026
Interaction of optical parameters in the perception of transparency/translucency and their neural representation in the visual cortex.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transparency and translucency are important visual attributes that serve as cues for object recognition and discrimination. The interaction between light and objects involves complex processes encompassing multiple factors. In this study, we systematically manipulated parameters of light transmission, scattering, and reflection to investigate their effects on perceived transparency/translucency in human subjects. We found that the extinction coefficient, a parameter governing transmission, exerts the greatest influence on perceived transparency/translucency across objects of varying shape complexity. However, albedo, which indicates the amount of scattering, also significantly affects the perceived transparency/translucency of objects with relatively simple geometries. Additionally, surface roughness, a reflection parameter, strongly influenced perceived transparency/translucency. We then examined single-neuron activities in the inferior temporal cortex of the macaque monkey, where previous studies have identified gloss-selective neurons. We recorded neural responses using stimulus sets comprising the same parameters tested in our psychophysical experiments. Many neurons exhibited selectivity for parameters related to perceived transparency/translucency, including extinction coefficient, albedo, and surface roughness. Furthermore, population responses of neurons selective for these parameters showed interaction patterns consistent with those observed in our psychophysical experiments. This suggests that neurons selective for these parameters in this area are related to the perception of transparency/translucency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.