ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2026
Yes, and: Leveraging peer-led professional development support as a bridge between the status quo and senior faculty-led efforts.
Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital medicine is a young and rapidly growing specialty. As such, most hospital medicine groups have many junior faculty with proportionately few senior faculty to support their career growth through traditional dyadic mentorship. As an alternative that may be more feasible in practice, we propose the development and expansion of peer-led efforts, in tandem with training efforts from organizations such as the Society of Hospital Medicine. In addition to logistical advantages, these approaches bring numerous benefits compared with traditional mentoring: potential for greater psychological safety and reciprocal social support, and opportunities to build career-long relationships. We believe that there are substantial opportunities for innovation and for scholarship to evaluate the impact and outcomes of peer mentorship efforts. We suggest several avenues for advancing peer mentorship within hospital medicine at the national, regional, local, and institutional levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.