ArticleJournal of morphology2026
Functional Morphology of the Oral Jaws and Dentition Across Diverse Diets and Ontogeny in Prickleback Fishes (Stichaeidae).
Article in Journal of morphology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pricklebacks (Stichaeidae) are a useful model for studying dietary diversity in fishes. Several species integrate increasing amounts of plant material into their diets as they grow, which is matched by physiological adaptations and allometric growth of the digestive tract to enhance the digestion of plant material. Similar to physiological differences, there are varying mechanical demands of eating plants compared to a carnivorous diet; we hypothesize that oral jaw morphology, dental characteristics, and tooth functional variation reflect diverse diets in pricklebacks. To explore this relationship, we first captured high-resolution jaw and dentition morphology using microCT scanning across four species of prickleback over ontogeny (n = 9 per species), and 3 outgroups (n = 3 per species). We compared traits between species and quantified the scaling of these traits over ontogeny. We then use linear discriminant analyses to identify traits that drive differences between dietary groups. Pricklebacks span a range of jaw and tooth morphotypes from large jaws with many villiform teeth, to short jaws with large, rounded teeth. While there is overlap between groups, we find several traits define dietary groups and diverge via allometry. However, comparison with outgroups reveals high morphological diversity within each dietary group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.