SynthesisClinical implant dentistry and related research2026
Resonance Frequency Analysis and Clinical Outcomes in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Using a Flex Constant to Monitor Implant Stability Changes in a Porcine Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGiven the growing use of resonance frequency analysis in clinical implantology and the inconsistent evidence regarding its prognostic value, this systematic review aimed to clarify the association between implant stability quotient (ISQ) with insertion torque (IT), marginal bone loss (MBL), and implant survival/success rate. MATERIAL AND
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science to answer the PIO question: "In systemically healthy patients undergoing implant placement, are ISQ values associated with intraoperative and postoperative surrogate parameters (IT and MBL) and clinical outcomes such as implant survival and success?" Risk of bias was assessed using design-specific methodological tools.
resultsForty-eight studies were included, and 20 were eligible for quantitative analysis of ISQ-IT correlation. A moderate and statistically significant association was observed (pooled r = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.32-0.55, p < 0.001), with substantial heterogeneity (I
conclusionsISQ shows a moderate correlation with IT, supporting its role as a complementary indicator of primary implant stability. However, high heterogeneity and limited certainty of evidence restrict its clinical interpretability. Current evidence does not support baseline ISQ values as independent predictors of MBL or implant survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.