ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
Developing a Clinical Prediction Model for Nonimprovement of Depressive Symptoms at Discharge After Treatment of Eating Disorders.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing a Clinical Prediction Model for Nonimprovement of Depressive Symptoms at Discharge After Treatment of Eating Disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDepressive symptoms are highly prevalent among people with eating disorders (ED). Although at the group level, depressive symptoms tend to improve alongside ED symptoms during treatment, many patients do not experience clinically meaningful reductions. Identifying at admission which patients are at risk for persistent depressive symptoms during ED treatment could support more personalized care and targeted treatment planning.
methodWe analyzed routinely collected electronic health record data from 1412 persons receiving inpatient or day hospital ED treatment. Two outcomes were examined: (1) nonimprovement of depressive symptoms and (2) residual depression at discharge. Two machine learning (ML) models, namely elastic net regularized regression and extreme gradient boosting, were applied. Model performance was evaluated using standard classification metrics, feature importance, and decision curve analysis.
resultsNonimprovement was predicted poorly (AUC = 0.64-0.65), whereas residual depression was predicted adequately (AUC = 0.73-0.77). Important predictors included phobic anxiety, resilience, life satisfaction, and baseline depression. Decision curve analysis indicated that all models provided greater net benefit than treating all or no patients across clinically relevant thresholds.
conclusionsA substantial portion of patients continued to experience notable depressive symptoms despite specialized ED treatment. Although predictive performance was moderate, our findings demonstrate the potential of preregistered and transparent ML approaches in ED settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.