ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Movies evoke dynamic emotional experiences that fluctuate moment-to-moment. While fMRI has mapped these fluctuations, the real-time continuous oscillatory dynamics underlying naturalistic viewing remain less understood. In this study, 25 adults watched an emotionally rich short film while EEG, continuous subjective arousal annotations and pupil diameter were recorded. Inter-subject correlation (ISC) analyses revealed robust synchronization in behavioural and pupillary arousal across the cohort. Leveraging these shared, group-level arousal trajectories to probe individual-level cortical processing, we mapped the neural networks correlating with these two arousal signals. Both pupillary and subjective arousal negatively correlated with low-frequency power in occipitoparietal regions, reflecting bottom-up sensory gain control and attentional gating. Furthermore, high-arousal epochs were marked by low-frequency desynchronization in the precuneus; this cortical activation likely indexes the rapid retrieval of episodic memories required to update the viewer's situational model during plot shifts. Finally, while both measures tracked low-frequency acoustic features in the auditory cortex, subjective arousal was more prominently associated with extended top-down semantic networks and central theta activity. These findings highlight that while pupillary arousal heavily reflects bottom-up sensory intensity, subjective reporting captures active cognitive integration. Together, this demonstrates how emotional arousal acts as a dynamic control signal, orchestrating a complex interplay of sensory gating, memory updating and top-down evaluation to make sense of the unfolding narrative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.