ArticleXenotransplantation
Views of Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients About Xenotransplantation in Türkiye: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this qualitative study is to demonstrate the views of patients who had undergone human-to-human liver transplantation towards xenotransplantation. The study included 20 patients who had experienced the transplant waiting process, transplantation surgery, and posttransplant period. The data were collected through in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview form. The findings indicated that patients' views on xenotransplantation varied between positive, negative, and ambivalent attitudes. While some of the participants indicated that they could accept such transplantation as the last resort with a utilitarian approach that prioritised the maintenance of life, some of them adopted a cautious or negative attitude due to religious beliefs, ethical concerns, and distrust of the unknown. Lack of information came forth as a determinative factor in indecision and dilemma. The views were categorised under the themes of acceptance for sustaining life, religious beliefs and ethical values, seeking trust in the face of uncertainty, psychosocial domain, and perceived opportunities and challenges. Generally, it was concluded that patients' attitudes towards xenotransplantation were shaped within a conditional acceptance framework and the process should be evaluated multidimensionally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.