ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Matching circadian rhythms to light-dark cycles increases lettuce yield by 29% in vertical farms without additional energy input.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most cultivated lettuce varieties have 27 h circadian clocks resulting from domestication-driven selection for delayed bolting yet are grown under standard 24 h light-dark cycles. This creates a fundamental mismatch between plant biology and cultivation practices. According to circadian resonance theory, this misalignment imposes chronic re-entrainment costs that reduce fitness. Here we demonstrate that eliminating this mismatch through circadian resonance, namely aligning environmental cycles with internal rhythms, increases lettuce biomass by 11-29% without additional lighting energy in commercial vertical farming conditions. We grew 20 lettuce accessions with characterized circadian periods (24-28 h) under six light-dark treatments combining two cycle lengths (24 h and 27 h) with three photoperiod regimes. Long-clock varieties (∼27 h) consistently accumulated more biomass under 27 h versus 24 h cycles when the daily light integral remained constant (14.4 mol m-2 d-1). Enhanced yields resulted from extended dark periods (11 h versus 8 h) rather than increased light input, representing a lighting-efficient cultivation strategy. High-energy treatments (18 mol m-2 d-1) achieved maximum biomass but triggered morphological aberrations and increased tipburn, while resonant conditions maintained quality standards. Resonant conditions also restored natural developmental timing, with long-clock varieties showing accelerated bolting that reversed the delayed flowering phenotype observed under 24 h cycles. Importantly, bolting still falls outside the cultivation window. Statistical modelling confirmed significant interactions between the circadian clock and the diel length, establishing circadian resonance as the primary driver of yield improvement. These findings reveal circadian resonance as a transformative strategy for yield enhancement in controlled-environment agriculture, such as vertical farms, achieving significant biomass gains through biological rhythm optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.