Observational studyThe Laryngoscope2026
Refining the Multivariable Predictive-Prognostic PREDICTR-OPC Model for Survival in Surgical Escalation for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Observational study in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe PREDICTR-OPC model is the only prognostic classifier for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) also predictive of surgical outcomes. Of the four biomarkers included, survivin contributes minimally and presents practical limitations. This study aimed to refine and simplify the model by removing survivin, then re-assess its prognostic predictive performance compared to the original.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed a multi-center training cohort (n = 600) and an external validation cohort (n = 385) of OPSCC patients. Tumor biopsies were stained for p16, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and survivin and independently scored by at least three certified pathologists. Cox proportional hazards models assessed overall survival (OS), comparing three-biomarker (p16, HR-HPV, TILs) and four-biomarker models. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were estimated in the validation cohort, adjusting for covariates. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated performance and clinical utility.
resultsAmong 985 patients (median age: 57 years), median OS = 8.8 years (95% CI: 6.9-10.5). The three-biomarker model yielded HR = 4.10 (95% CI: 2.41-6.98, p < 0.001) for high- vs. low-risk groups in the validation cohort, comparable to the four-biomarker model (HR = 4.24, p < 0.001). Surgery was associated with improved OS in high-risk (HR = 0.45, p = 0.001) but not low-risk (HR = 0.83, p = 0.72) patients, consistent with the original model. The models performed similarly across all metrics (e.g., Concordance Index: 0.71 vs. 0.72; Brier Score: 0.22 for both) as was model fit (Likelihood Ratio Test: p = 0.066). DCA revealed comparable clinical benefit.
conclusionRemoving survivin preserves PREDICTR-OPC's predictive performance, offering a more cost-effective, easier-to-implement tool for OPSCC treatment recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.