Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42117384›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Copas-Heckman-Type Sensitivity Analysis for Publication Bias in Rare-Event Meta-Analysis Under Generalized Linear Mixed Models.

Yi Zhou, Taojun Hu, Yuji Sakamoto, Ao Huang, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Satoshi Hattori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi ZhouDivision of Mathematics and Informatics, Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-3245
Taojun HuDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Yuji SakamotoDivision of Mathematics and Informatics, Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Ao HuangGraduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-7658
Xiao-Hua ZhouBeijing International Center for Mathematical Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-1222
Satoshi HattoriDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-1408

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 25K03086Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 26K21181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In systematic reviews and meta-analyses, publication bias (PB) is one of the serious concerns and mainly induced by selective publication of academic literatures. Although many methods have been proposed to address PB, almost all of them are based on the normal-normal (NN) random-effects model, assuming that data are normally distributed at both the within-study and between-study levels. For rare-event meta-analysis where data contain rare occurrences of events, the standard NN random-effects model may perform poorly. Instead, some generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) which employ the exact distribution for the number of events at the within-study level increase the estimation accuracy and have been widely used in practice. However, limited methods can be applied to address PB in the GLMMs. To address this limitation, we propose a framework of sensitivity analysis for evaluating the impact of PB in the contrast-based GLMMs. The proposed framework is developed based on the famous Copas-Heckman-type sensitivity analysis methods by relating study-specific true effect sizes with the latent Gaussian variable on the study sample sizes for adjusting PB. The proposed methods completely avoid the need for continuity corrections and can be easily implemented using standard software with low computational cost. Simulation studies are conducted to assess the performance of the proposed methods in adjusting PB and compare the results with related existing methods. Several real-world examples are also analyzed to show the broad applicability of our proposal in evaluating the potential impact of PB in meta-analysis of odds ratios and proportions with rare-event outcomes.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicPublication BiasComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLinear Modelsbinomial distributioncontinuity correctionhypergeometric distributionrandom‐effects meta‐analysisrare eventsselection function

Identifiers

PMID42117384
PMCPMC13162210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.