ArticleEpilepsia open2026
Effectiveness and safety of implantable vagus nerve stimulation in people with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMost therapies for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) focus on focal-onset seizures, the most common seizure types. Studying primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) is more challenging due to diagnostic and recruitment difficulties. While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is globally established in DRE with focal-onset seizures, approved indications vary by region. This study assesses the safety and effectiveness of VNS therapy in individuals with drug-resistant PGTCS.
methodsData from five studies were included in the analysis. The PGTCS group included 170 participants with reported PGTCS who received VNS therapy and completed 24 months of follow-up. Outcomes included observed and Bayesian-estimated PGTCS responder rates (≥50% seizure reduction) and seizure frequency changes. Observed rates were determined from clinical studies, while Bayesian responder rates were estimated using a hierarchical model.
resultsThe Bayesian hierarchical model estimated the 24-month PGTCS responder rate for patients in CORE-VNS to be 65.2% (95% credible interval: 55.1%-75.1%). The Bayesian estimate at 24 months for responder rates across all studies was 65.5%. Most responders (91.7%) maintained their response from 6 and 12 months to 24 months. Median seizure frequency decreased by 71.4% for PGTCS and 62.5% for all seizures at 24 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were low and consistent with those seen in people with focal-onset seizures treated with VNS therapy. No new safety concerns were identified, including no increased risk of Status Epilepticus (SE) or death. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support VNS therapy as a safe and effective treatment for reducing PGTCS in participants with DRE. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) carry higher risks of complications and death than focal-onset seizures. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS therapy) is approved for drug-resistant PGTCS outside the USA. Data from five LivaNova-sponsored clinical studies show that VNS therapy is safe and effective in adults and children. Among 170 participants, about 66% had a ≥50% reduction in PGTCS at 24 months, and 92% of early responders maintained improvement. Among 149 participants, median PGTCS frequency fell by 71%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were low, with no new safety concerns identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.