Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42117349›Full record

ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2026

Assessing the Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Practices on Soil Erosion and Soil Fertility in the Fetam Watershed in the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia.

Sewyalew Tadele, Eyasu Elias, Abreham Berta Aneseyee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sewyalew TadeleCollege of Computational and Natural Sciences, Center of Environmental Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1330-4885
Eyasu EliasCollege of Computational and Natural Sciences, Center of Environmental Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-6470
Abreham Berta AneseyeeCollege of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Department of Natural Resource Management, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia, wku.edu.et.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-3768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding sustainable land management is important for agricultural production. However, soil fertility has been declining due to anthropogenic and natural factors. To curb these problems, soil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been implemented over the last 15 years in the study watershed, but their impact has not been studied in detail. Therefore, this study was conducted to study the effects of SWC practices on soil fertility and soil erosion in the Fetam watershed. The Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) and sediment delivery ratio (SDR) model were used to analyze the sedimentation based on the required input parameters of the model such as land-use/land-coverraster data, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation factors such as rainfall-erosivity data, erodobilityfactor, cover factor (C), and management factors (P) and raster digital elevation model including the boundary of the study area in vector form. A total of 32 soil samples (0-20 cm) were collected and disaggregated by landscape position: upper, middle, and downstream. After collecting soil samples, the soil physicochemical properties, such as texture and bulk density (BD), and chemical properties such as (pH), organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (AP), exchangeable bases, and cation exchnage capacity (CEC) were analyzed using standard laboratory procedures in the treated (Hunkan) and untreated (Kindikan) subwatersheds. The t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) results show that the physical and chemical properties of soil differed significantly between treated and untreated subwatersheds and between upper and lower landscape positions (p < 0.05). The mean soil loss in treated and untreated microwatersheds was 14.43 ± 6.63 and 20.31 ± 10.28 t/ha, respectively. This indicates that the SWC structures implemented in the treated subwatershed contributed to reducing soil erosion rates. The treated watershed and lower landscape position had the highest OC (3.69 ± 0.23) and the lowest BD (1.05 ± 0.01). In contrast, the untreated watershed and upper landscape position had the highest BD (1.21 ± 0.01) and the lowest OC (2.35 ± 0.23). Overall, the soil fertility parameters were most favorable in the treated fields and lower-slope positions, suggesting that SWC measures implemented have significantly improved soil fertility and reduced soil loss. Therefore, it is necessary to scale up the SWC practices to other untreated areas of the watershed in the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia to achieve sustainable development.

Indexed as

slope positionsoil and water conservation practicessoil fertilitysubwatersheds

Identifiers

PMID42117349
PMCPMC13162130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.