ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026
Development and expert consensus on an action protocol for multidisciplinary vascular access teams.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The implementation of specialized multidisciplinary vascular access teams (VATs), composed of healthcare professionals with advanced expertise, has been recommended to ensure best practices in the insertion, management, and monitoring of vascular access devices. The aim is to standardize the intervention of a multidisciplinary vascular access team, through the construction of an action protocol. Methods: This mixed-method study used an exploratory, descriptive qualitative approach followed by a quantitative Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. Twenty healthcare professionals participated in the qualitative phase, while twenty experts, all trained in ultrasound-guided vascular access, were involved in the quantitative phase. Results: The qualitative analysis revealed the need for a structured protocol addressing device selection, patient assessment, and activation criteria. The quantitative phase achieved 100 % consensus on the proposed interventions, leading to the construction of a validated flowchart for VAT actions. Conclusions: A consensus-based protocol was successfully developed, integrating evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus. This protocol can improve clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and resource optimization and can be adapted for implementation in other healthcare institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.