Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42117094›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026

Development and expert consensus on an action protocol for multidisciplinary vascular access teams.

Filipa Isabel Martins Santos, Vítor Rodrigues, Carlos Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filipa Isabel Martins SantosSchool of Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5932-1689
Vítor RodriguesRISE-Health: Health Research and Innovation, Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Clinical Academic Center of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, CACTMAD, School of Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-685X
Carlos AlmeidaRISE-Health: Health Research and Innovation, Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Clinical Academic Center of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, CACTMAD, School of Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The implementation of specialized multidisciplinary vascular access teams (VATs), composed of healthcare professionals with advanced expertise, has been recommended to ensure best practices in the insertion, management, and monitoring of vascular access devices. The aim is to standardize the intervention of a multidisciplinary vascular access team, through the construction of an action protocol. Methods: This mixed-method study used an exploratory, descriptive qualitative approach followed by a quantitative Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. Twenty healthcare professionals participated in the qualitative phase, while twenty experts, all trained in ultrasound-guided vascular access, were involved in the quantitative phase. Results: The qualitative analysis revealed the need for a structured protocol addressing device selection, patient assessment, and activation criteria. The quantitative phase achieved 100 % consensus on the proposed interventions, leading to the construction of a validated flowchart for VAT actions. Conclusions: A consensus-based protocol was successfully developed, integrating evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus. This protocol can improve clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and resource optimization and can be adapted for implementation in other healthcare institutions.

Indexed as

delphi studymultidisciplinary vascular access teamprotocolultrasound-guided accessvascular access management

Identifiers

PMID42117094
PMCPMC13157232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.